March 16

Close Reading to M. NourbeSe Philip from Zong!

Is social justice can be deeply discussed through literature? That was the only question, which was repeating itself in my mind while I was reading this article and/or piece.

Being interested in race and racism issues- which is clearly affect the social justice in any nation-, Philip introduced a unique piece of writing that is taken from legal documents.

“Zong case” is a cheerless incident that happened in 1781 where a ship -comprised 470 slaves besides the owners themselves- got lost due to navigation error. The result was, almost 60 person died because of being thirsty, and 40 others had the same fate because of either being thirst or frenzy! While others threw themselves into the sea, and simply drowned without any guilt unless being a Negro!

The whole story, in turn, indicates that race and racism- with all of this issue’s consequences- is an old complication that has been following people all over their history! And that is clear in this story that happened more than 200 years ago! Consequently, the writer, Philip, tended to write such a fragment peace as she wanted- I think- to get her audience involved with the analyzation of her work.

In my opinion, I think what she did is not fully clear. I believe if she addressed her issue and thoughts in a more direct way that would be fascinating! What she did, in my view, is something similar to what some Arabic writers do when they want to offer controversial, political or religious issue, they will try to play with words, hiding meanings and involving the public with their work. By doing so, they will serve themselves of any punishment or popular anger, for instance.

 

 


Posted March 16, 2015 by Ms. Nourah Alsubaie in category Uncategorized

1 thoughts on “Close Reading to M. NourbeSe Philip from Zong!

  1. Ms. Hediye Ozkan

    I felt the same confusion about Zolf’s intention and direction of her criticism when I was reading the book. The text is a stream of consciousness of Zolf. I was wondering why they have to be so complicated. The ambiguity in the text and form as we have discussed last week is maybe the best incentive for the reader to do research. Although not specifically about Neighbour Procedure, she has done several interviews explaining the motives and intention behind her writing style. Even some of her answers for the questions in the interviews are sophisticated and vauge. That’s what makes her Racher Zolf I guess.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*