Before listing the traffic reports, Goldsmith conveys in his text “Traffic” a segment of an interview. The interviewer asks the interviewee about his Death series and the interviewee states “I realized that everything I was doing must have been Death… and every time you turned on the radio they said something like, ‘Four million are going to die’”. From the beginning, readers are introduced to the ideas of death, life, and the limitations of life as the whole text is associated with time. Every report is connected to a specific hour of the day; however, as Marjorie Perloff states in her chapter entitled “Conceptualist Bridges / Digital Tunnels: Kenneth Goldsmith’s Traffic”, the hours are not specified or associated with day or night but are rather left undesignated. The theme of traffic instills the sense of being besieged and trapped within time and place. Goldsmith’s unwillingness to declare the exact time makes me wonder if these traffic reports occur within one specific day. In other words, reading the text gives me the feeling that these traffic events are not limited to one day, but are rather recorded over a longer period of time or over a couple of days. I arrive at this realization because the last report refers to the traffic problems solved and to the smooth movements of traffic with no delays, all of which I believe need more time to pass. Several questions are posited and many attempts are made to understand and draw connections between Goldsmith’s “Traffic” and the key components of time and place. Accordingly, I think that even what he calls unoriginal or uncreative texts are original and creative if readers and critics do not conform them to traditional judgment approaches.
4 thoughts on “Thoughts on Goldsmith’s “Traffic””
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I think that you touched an important topic. Death is quintessentially a postmodernist theme; I noticed how much Goldsmith is obsessed with it in this work. Equally important, leaving the hours undesignated has a significance in the work. Do you think that presenting them in this way is naturalistic? My question is because they are similar to the real hours in our daily life. Many hours sometimes pass in hour daily life without counting them or even connecting them to a specific day; we forget them after they pass.
Tariq, I think Goldsmith raises our awareness of time in purpose. I believe that each of his texts has a purpose and never aimless. you may notice that his articles show his intelligence and present him as an expert in his field. Goldsmith is not merely collecting random texts and put them together, he knows what he is doing and why, and his texts have themes and structure which I think makes them creative in a way or another.
Asma,
I share you the same wonder about the reason why Goldsmith does not tell us the exact day he is reporting. However, the whole report that we have happens in one day, an unusual one, starting at 12.00 AM and ending at 12.00 AM. it extends to 24 hours. Just note that page 41marks the middle point in terms of the spatiotemporal of the “Traffic.” So, you feel that the pieces develops as time progresses, and draws to closure as we approach the end of the day.
I thought he was reporting on the traffic for Feb 23, 2015!